Sep 2020Ships that pass in the night. The philosophical implications of the intersection of politics and therapy. – 06/09/2020:
Our September meeting will be presented by Peter Fleming. This will be an online session on Zoom
Politics could be described as how the world outside of us functions and treats us. Government, the result for better or worse of politics, affects all our lives. It could be said that politics is our external world. Therapy is our internal world. Therapy is about how we live with ourselves and those we love.
There is wisdom and struggle in both the external and the internal. And yet they do not meet. They do not share what they are attempting, how they have failed and how they aspire. A shame. Both worlds have much to offer each other. It seems they are threatened by each other, they do not see each other, they certainly miss the contributions they could make to each other. So, ships that pass in the night.
To access the meeting please click on the following link SLPC Zoom Meeting
The Zoom meeting will be available from 12:15
Aug 2020Nicolas Hyman - False memories and counterfactuals – 02/08/2020:
Nicholas Hyman will will speak on False memories and counterfactuals.
Jul 2020The Morality of Assassination Politics: Reflections on the ideas of cypherpunk libertarian Jim Bell – 05/07/2020:
Our July meeting will be an online discussion
Anglican priest Frank Gelli will introduce a discussion on ‘The Morality of Assassination Politics: Reflections on the ideas of cypherpunk libertarian Jim Bell’
To access the meeting please go to the following link http://londonphilosophy.net/zoom-meetings/virtual-slpc-meeting/
The Zoom meeting will be available from 12:15 to allow us to work through any technical issues
Jun 2020Concept of human nature: what is it useful for? – 07/06/2020:
Our June meeting will be an online discussion.
Arnis Altens will introduce the topic with a few examples of how philosophers have used the concept of human nature in the past and proceed with pointing to relevant contemporary debates. To start the discussion he will outline a couple of meanings that might be useful in contemporary debates about human well-being and biomedical enhancements
The Zoom meeting will be available from 12:15 to allow us to get over any technical issues
To access the meeting please click on the following link SLPC Zoom Meeting
May 2020What are the philosophical implications of the fact that the Covid crisis reminds, or makes many people think, of 1940 – 03/05/2020:
We will have another online meeting at 12:30 on Sunday 3rd May 2020. This will be a discussion titled “What are the philosophical implications of the fact that the Covid crisis reminds, or makes many people think, of 1940”.
Epidemiologists and meteorologists both devote a great deal of thought to devising models, which is not so different from philosophical “thought experiments”. Common to both science and philosophy are the importance of analogical arguments and devising new models (fresh metaphors) as well as being aware of the hidden metaphors that sometimes lock us into models that have outlived their usefulness. We also need to consider the lessons of history and how a historical take on philosophy can help us with the important decisions we have to make today.
To access the meeting please click on the following link http://londonphilosophy.net/zoom-meetings/virtual-slpc-meeting/
The Zoom meeting will be available from 12:15 to allow us to get over any technical issues
Apr 2020Online Meeting - Covid-19 - cognitive and ethical issues – 05/04/2020:
Because of the current restrictions we will have an online meeting in April at 12:15 on Sunday 5th April 2020. This will be a discussion with the title Covid-19 – cognitive and ethical issues. To access the meeting please click on the following link http://londonphilosophy.net/zoom-meetings/virtual-slpc-meeting/
The meeting will start at 12:15 to allow us to get over any technical issues
As preparation for this discussion you may wish to listen to a recent episode of the Radio 4 series The Global Philosopher “Pandemic ethics” in particular the question at around 26 minutes in “How to allocate scarce access to life saving treatments”
Mar 2020Boycotts? – 01/03/2020:
A group discussion on boycotts. Nicholas Hyman will give a short introduction
Feb 2020Nice: the Philosophical Implications of a Four Letter Word – 02/02/2020:
There are healing forces in our world that get buried under the way language has to serve power, prestige and careers. Peter will try to explore this issue from his therapeutic learning perspective. Including for this meeting is a particular device he uses in his training programmes.
Jan 2020Nicholas Hyman – The Eerie and Capitalist Realism from Freud via Russia to Mark Fisher – 12/01/2020:
Dec 2019Bob Clarke - Postmodernism Revisited via its Altercations with Science – 01/12/2019:
The philosophical and sociological Postmodernism of the 1970s to 90s, most specifically its relativisation of ‘truth’, stands accused by some of contributing to undesirable features in today’s popular politics. We will examine Postmodernism’s past altercations with Science to see how this may have come about. On the way we will look at ‘Modernism’, the Western ‘Postmodern Condition’, the concept of the ‘Social Construction of Science’, the ‘Science Wars’, ‘The Sokal Hoax’ and, in particular, the philosophical and sociological thought of Bruno Latour. Are today’s ‘Climate Change Denial’ and ’Anti-vaxxing’ movements products of late 20th Century intellectual Postmodernism?
Nov 2019'Is There a Case for Slavery?' by the Revd Frank Julian Gelli – 03/11/2019:
This paper is not meant to advocate slavery but to explain possible reasons for it today, morally speaking.
The paper distinguishes between a):involuntary or compelled slavery and b):voluntary or chosen servitude.
After some historical considerations and clarifications, I shall discuss a possible case for voluntary slavery, drawing chiefly on the ideas put forward by the libertarian philosopher Robert Nozick.
Involuntary or forced slavery may seem at first morally abhorrent but I shall also briefly explain its possible grounds.
Oct 2019Is there a way for Liberal Democracy to survive in the 21st Century? - Nicholas Hyman – 06/10/2019:
What is Liberalism and ditto Democracy?
Travails and parallels from 1930’s, contrasts too
Sep 2019Aspects of Liberalism – 01/09/2019:
A debate on the multifaceted nature of liberalism
We invite attendees to present their views of liberalism (5 min) followed by discussion
Aug 2019Eric Phipps - Spinoza – 04/08/2019:
This introduction proposes to open the floor for a discussion on the relevance of Spinoza for 21st. century Humankind.
Jul 2019Peter Fleming - Tenderness – 07/07/2019:
King Lear, Michelangelo, Dr King and what Freud did not know
Jun 2019Cognitive Biases - Kieran Quill – 02/06/2019:
Kieran Quill will speak on Cognitive Biases
The slant with be towards these universal biases at work in conducting scientific research, and in everyday life. Are these biases common in philosophy too? Do philosophers acknowledge them? Are there corrective mechanisms- as there are in the sciences? Does it make sense to have “corrective mechanisms” in philosophy?
May 2019What is the Socratic Method - Nicky Hyman – 05/05/2019:
Nicholas Hyman explores what is called the Socratic Method, akin if not also known as Platonic Dialogue. Drawing out a conclusion is not just persuasive and convincing. We learn why something is the case, not from authority, and still less from pious conformity. Other individuals may then be enlightened, woke indeed.
Richard Price and Plato’s Phaedrus induces how to proceed, ineluctably and with clarity. Divisions between beauty and truth are not to be overcome, contrary to Keats’s exhilarating injunction.
Apr 2019The Philosophical Implications of March 29th - Iain Orr – 07/04/2019:
Iain Orr will lead a discussion on the Philosophical implications of March 29th
Mar 2019Karl Popper and Biology - Bob Clarke – 03/03/2019:
Feb 2019Conspiracies that never die - Nicky Hyman – 03/02/2019:
The age of President Trump, the Brexit campaign and illiberal regimes in Budapest and Warsaw has parallels with the anti-intellectual, fascisant climate of the 1930s.
A cluster of tenets are underpinned by a conspiracy theory, its evidence adaptable to antisemitism, racism or Russophobia. What are the philosophical and historical roots of these belief systems?
Jan 2019Kierkegaard's Fear And Trembling - Barrie Selwyn – 06/01/2019:
Barrie Selwyn will speak on Kierkegaard’s Fear And Trembling
Dec 2018Negative Dialectics - Monica Booth – 02/12/2018:
Part I: Concepts
How does Adorno mark the difference between his materialism and Hegel’s idealism?
You are recommended to read #5, “negative dialectics” from the Stanford Philosophy website entry on Adorno. The article points to some of the concepts Adorno raises in his Frankfurt University lectures 1965/66 which be the basis of the talk
Nov 2018Pride - Peter Fleming – 04/11/2018:
Oct 2018Socrates, the Hemlock Cup and the Socratic Method - Nicholas Hyman – 07/10/2018:
How do we know about the life and death of Socrates, and what is the Socratic method?
Sep 2018Averroës - Ibn Rushd – 02/09/2018:
The philosophy of Ibn Rushd – Frank Gelli
Ibn Rushd – known in the West as Averroës – is arguably the greatest Arab/Muslim philosopher. The important issues he grappled with are still with us today, the age of fundamentalism, ISIS and the so-called ‘clash of civilisations’. I will discuss some key feature of his thought but if you want a brief, fictional and amusing introduction to this great man’s ideas, read J.L. Borges’ entertaining short story ‘Averroës’s Search’, Available in paperback, in any collection of Borges’ works
Aug 2018A discussion on the family - Introduced by Iain Orr – 05/08/2018:
Iain Orr will introduce a discussion on “The family – a necessary concept in ethics (Confucian, Nicomachean, Kantian and Utilitarian?), political philosophy and epistemology (and even metaphysics), or not?”
Jul 2018Bob Clarke - Imagination Part 1: The Core Imagination – 01/07/2018:
An examination of the proposition, formulated by Enlightenment Empiricist philosophers and by Immanuel Kant, that our Imagination is central to our very way of being in the world. How does this proposition fare when seen from the perspectives of contemporary neurological and cognitive sciences? It may be that the ‘Creative Imagination’, which is so important for the Arts and Sciences, arises from an ‘overflowing’ of our Core Imagination, which is essential for us to be able to make any sense of the world at all! The talk will fall into three sections: (1) The Productive Imagination, (2) “If”, (3) Causality.
Jun 2018Causality and physical history – 03/06/2018:
Björn Patricks will present the book Ubiquity.
Narratives of history are always problematic, as they are made after the event, and can offer a very limited number of causal chains. But focusing on the underlying structures and forces at work can help to make sense of historical developments. Mark Buchanan’s book Ubiquity use examples from the physical world to compare with social events to maybe shine some light on their nature.
May 2018Nicholas Hyman - Tacit and Direct Knowledge – 06/05/2018:
How much of our knowledge is direct? Nicholas Hyman explores the area of tacit knowledge with reference to Thomas Kuhn and paradigms
Apr 2018Iain Orr - Facts and Truth, Guilt and Innocence - Philosophical Reflections on Jury Service – 08/04/2018:
see attached PDF for further details
Mar 2018Philosophical Discussion – 04/03/2018:
We were hoping for a talk from Iain Orr but unfortunately he has been taken ill. Members will still get together for a philosophical discussion at the Draft House. Please join us
Feb 2018Peter Fleming - Truth – 04/02/2018:
Peter’s background is not academic but has been as a practitioner in therapy.
The website of his organisation http://www.pellin.org.uk provides context
Jan 2018Are fascism and exterminism distinct? – 07/01/2018:
Are fascism and exterminism distinct – with special reference to Mussolini, terrorism and bellicosity, and nuclear weapons 1912-2018?
Dec 2017Peter Fleming - If we do not understand each other we do not survive. – 03/12/2017:
This is a continuation of Peter Fleming’s talk on Compassion earlier in the year. He will be looking philosophically at the place of empathy in the human condition and speculating on both the origins and necessity of empathy
Peter’s background is not academic but has been as a practitioner in therapy.
The website of his organisation www.pellin.org.uk provides context
Nov 2017Monica Booth - Language – 05/11/2017:
Taken as a system of communication between members of multifarious social groups for cooperating, whether spoken, written, or in sign, language between human beings differentiates itself from language between non-human beings by its nature of having infinite productivity and creativity. Yet, at the same time it depends on the unequivocal acceptance of certain notions, standardized in convention by cooperative individuals and members of social groups, especially if progress is to occur.
If progress is taken to mean either positivism or intuitionism, then the nature of relationship between “language” and “thinking” becomes important. “Thinking” itself has a number of linguistic and philosophical presuppositions.
This linguistic phenomenology talk will give examples beginning with an overview of the general functions of language in Western traditions and finishing with the work of J L Austin in everyday language philosophy
Oct 2017Nicky Hyman - Russia and whether ten days, or ten years, or a century changed the world : Faustian aspects of ascending to power – 01/10/2017:
Sep 2017Iain Orr - Tiny /Giant Alice in Wonderland – and the Seven S’s: Size, Shape, Scale, Similarity, Senses, Substance and Solipsism. – 03/09/2017:
Aug 2017Bob Clarke – Radical Agnosticism – 06/08/2017:
The talk will present ‘Radical Agnosticism’, a position which may be distinguished from both Atheism and Belief (religious or mystical) in its attitude towards transcendent worlds and entities, such as Heaven, The World of Forms, God, Spirits, Angels, Souls, Spirits, etc. In the absence of evidence of their existence, Radical Agnosticism withholds commitment to all such transcendent entities, but, unlike some contemporary forms of Atheism, respects many aspects of religion.
Jul 2017Perspectives on the Philosophy of Governance – 02/07/2017:
Below is the sketch I am currently working to, but there is still time for the focus to sharpen or even for the scope to expand
The talk will attempt to bring together concepts from political philosophy, corporate governance, and management. It will review various manifestations of governance to highlight common factors and sources of puzzlement.
“Human nature” will be considered as a fulcrum on which to leverage theory-building by considering on the one hand our need to deal with people on the basis of reasonable expectations, and on the other our relatively limited ability to predict outcomes even when there is a sincere and skilled attempt to achieve them.
Depending on time, some attention may also be given to the lurking suspicion that theories of governance are part of a discourse that assumes the legitimacy of current power and domination models, and to proposing a clarification of the concepts of law, regulation, governance and governmentality.
Further details are given in the attached PDF
Jun 2017The Russian Revolution in Philosophy – 04/06/2017:
Nicholas Hyman explores perceived Russian transitions, including the abolition of serfdom and the abortive 1905 revolution culminating in two revolutions of 1917.
What was the impact of change and of the civil war, on thought about what was possible, and about ends and means, in and beyond Russia, to 1945 and on to the 21st Century?
May 2017The Philosophy of the Anthropocene – 07/05/2017:
An introduction to the Anthropocene:
The talk will fall into three sections. First, what implications has the Anthropocene – as an emerging geological concept – for other disciplines: biology, theology, anthropology and philosophy? Second, should Homo sapiens aspire to be the steward of the natural world; indeed, is H sapiens now unable to avoid that responsibility? Are there non-H.sapiens candidates for that role? Third, what are the political, economic and ethical implications of anthropic global commons? [i.e. What can any human individual, community or country own – and what does ownership mean?] Benjamine Kunkel’s review essay The Capitalocene in the 2 March 2017 issue of the London Review of Books” is a good introduction to the subject.
Apr 2017Peter Fleming - Empathy – 02/04/2017:
Peter Fleming – Founder of the Pellin Institute – pellin.org.uk
Peter a Humanistic Psychotherapist and will speak on Empathy
Mar 2017Hegel and Progress (with some reference to Kant and Marx) – 05/03/2017:
The idea of progress only became fully thinkable with the French Revolution in history and German Idealism in philosophy. Hegel was able to develop an explanatory relationship between progress in philosophy and progress in history. By looking at Hegel, and looking at Kant and Marx, we will be able to see the basis of progress in philosophical truth and historical truth. Progress must be defended against the pessimists.
Feb 2017The End of Art – 05/02/2017:
‘I studied Art Theory and Aesthetics in the same way that other people might study pyramids. It was assumed by my tutors and the texts we read that the “modern” approach to Art, Culture and a way of thinking had ended sometime after the Second World War. Art still happens, artefacts still exist and have relevance to our lives, Egypt is still an important country with culture and even pyramids- but we don’t do pyramids any more.’
Jan 2017Aspects of R G Collingwood – 08/01/2017:
Bob Clarke will discuss R G Collingwood.
R G Collingwood was an English Idealist Philosopher, a polymath, active in Philosophy (and Archaeology!) between the First and Second World Wars. One of his main commitments was to the importance of History for Philosophy. What can he tell us about our own ‘Post-Truth’ age? A few ideas will be canvassed …
Dec 2016Catastrophes and Philosophy – 04/12/2016:
Tambora 1815 to nuclear winter, foreshadowed by the Lisbon earthquake, is a trajectory with impact on mentalities, norms and perceived obligations. Why do most people exclude catastrophes from their probability list?
Nov 2016Coining, Context, Contingency - Philosophy as History? – 06/11/2016:
Just how, and to what extent, is Philosophy dependent on History?
Oct 2016Referenda – 02/10/2016:
When should we trust people to vote as a way of deciding who is to exercise political power? Is there still life in representative Parliamentary Democracy? Are simple majority decisions the best way to address disputes over constitutional matters?
Sep 2016Fascism and Philosophy – 04/09/2016:
From 1922 to 1945, Mussolini then Hitler favoured particular contemporary philosophers. Not with a focus on Heidegger, what was the content and style of Fascist or Nazi philosophy, and does it affect us now?
Aug 2016Abstract Expressionism – 07/08/2016:
What does Abstract Expressionism express, and where does it abstract if from?
Abstract Expressionism is a modern art movement, epitomised by large American paintings with no discernible subject matter. Epitomised by works like Jackson Pollock’s canvases covered with drips of paint, or Barnet Newman’s enormous pictures with just one vertical stripe. As these were clearly not trying to depict a physical object were they trying to express something about the world, or the artists’ minds, or make some phenomenological comment about the spectator’s observation of the world?
Jul 2016Does social class dissolution equate with social class revolution? – 03/07/2016:
Dr. Helena Marconell
The concept of social class is changing rapidly with many mainstreams influencing the way we view it not only on ourselves but in others too. You might have less means than others but you still think you’re fine, in a normal kind of class; you go by, you like what you like and this is fine, should you need anything else?
And this seems to apply to poorer and richer alike. The feeling of being more or less seems to have transformed onto ‘I’m fine, I survive, I make ends meet’. However, before the advent of media platforms and hidden investments in tax havens, people had a more rigid way of who was who with a regular tension in the middle and poorer strata of society.
Let’s face it, the rich have always been the rich and like a plague, they pass it on to their descendants. The problem I see now is that the rich are continuously being richer and the poor are poorer than ever. This is baffling in an era of equality and supposedly more work, shouldn’t it be easier to be upwardly mobile? This is reinforced by the fact that the middle class seems to move like a wave according to the job availabilities, property prospects and so on. You might have a job today, and be in the street tomorrow, literally in the street and suddenly become as poor as you could be with many people ending up going back to parental homes in order to survive. And then going to the parental home does not make them any richer, they still feel poor, without the means to be independent. This is what I call a social dissolution, one day you‘ve got money, a rented or a mortgaged flat, the following day car is gone, even the door mat disappears. But the rich seem to be doing alright, as long as there are tax heavens to hide their wealth and create these massive black holes where the wealth of the whole world is being absorbed into, they are fine. Do you think that we need a social class revolution?
I will also bring a little quiz to prove some of these points and more, see how we all fair. For instance, would going to the opera make you feel more ‘upwardly mobile’ than you are now? Do you like going to the opera? Would you go if that was considered the ‘thing’ to do in the new group you just joined in that big promotion at work?
Jun 2016Ayer's Hume and Other Humes – 05/06/2016:
Nicky Hyman on Ayer’s Hume and Other Humes
A J Ayer’s book on David Hume, now in the Oxford Very Short Introduction Series, has been influential. We will discuss Ayer’s reading of Hume and examine other interpretations for the 21st Century.
May 2016The Caring Professions – 01/05/2016:
Apr 2016Islands - Why do they matter philosophically? – 03/04/2016:
Islands – Why do they matter philosophically?
Mar 2016Public Intellectuals Part 2 (Chomsky) – 06/03/2016:
Public Intellectuals, Bourgeois Intelligentsia, or Rooted Cosmopolitanism Rides Again 1800 – 2016
Feb 2016Life – Part 3: Autopoiesis. – 07/02/2016:
This will be the third and last of our philosophical investigations into how we can go about understanding Life on Earth. We have been looking at both ‘Top Down’ (e.g. cultural) and ‘Bottom Up’ (e.g. materialist, reductionist) ways of understanding Life and focussing on intellectual movements that are seeking to reconcile these two approaches. In this meeting we will investigate the concept of “autopoiesis”: the idea that the major concern of lifeforms is self-making. We will also look into the “Four E’s” that have come to be associated with autopoiesis: Embodiment, Enaction, Embeddedness and Extension. The presentation will summarise the discussions held in Parts 1 and 2, relating autopoiesis to them in a broader context, but will be self-contained so that those who missed the earlier discussions should have no difficulty following the general line of thought here and can be encouraged to attend.
Jan 2016No SLPC Event – 03/01/2016:
There will be no meeting of South London Philosophy Circle on Sunday 3rd January 2016.
Dec 2015Is Psychotherapy taking over the world? – 06/12/2015:
Heward Wilkinson will speak on
Is Psychotherapy taking over the world? How Psychotherapy became the foundational paradigm for our time
Nov 2015Russell and Chomsky – 08/11/2015:
Nick Hyman presenting:
Russell and Chomsky.
Enlightenment and World’s Tuning
As with Voltaire earlier, Russell then Chomsky were widely influential public intellectuals, whose dissent became a new consensus, if not orthodoxy. How came this sage role, and did it detract from other work each achieved ?
Feb 2012Denigrating Reason – 05/02/2012: